§ The result
Tenzo AI leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
Tenzo AI finishes 19 points clear of AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 37 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Tenzo AI leads every one of the 7 criteria, AmazingHiring none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, AmazingHiring 50 to Tenzo AI 55. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (AmazingHiring 22, Tenzo AI 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage Tenzo AI holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Tenzo AI
Tenzo AI's AI recruiter, Morgan, screens and interviews applicants by phone, SMS, email, WhatsApp or video in 40+ languages, scores them against employer-defined rubrics with fraud and identity checks, schedules next rounds, and writes scores, transcripts and recordings back to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Tenzo AI is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Tenzo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Tenzo AI 83
11.0 weighted points to Tenzo AI
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Tenzo AI 45
2.0 weighted points to Tenzo AI
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Tenzo AI 40
1.5 weighted points to Tenzo AI
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Tenzo AI 60
1.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Tenzo AI 45
1.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Tenzo AI 62
0.8 weighted points to Tenzo AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Tenzo AI 55
0.8 weighted points to Tenzo AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Tenzo AI.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Tenzo AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 45 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 83 | -61 | -11.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 45 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 56 (F) | -19 | -18.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Tenzo AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tenzo AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next