§ The result
Cappfinity leads Aon Assessment by 5 points.
Cappfinity finishes 5 points ahead of Aon Assessment under rubric v1.0, 40 to 35, both scored as Assessment entries. Cappfinity leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while Aon Assessment leads 2, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 38, Cappfinity 52, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Cappfinity holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
§ The record
Aon Assessment and Cappfinity are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Cappfinity |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | GB |
| Founded | 2002 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Cappfinity 52
2.1 weighted points to Cappfinity
12% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Cappfinity 38
1.6 weighted points to Cappfinity
12% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Cappfinity 52
0.8 weighted points to Cappfinity
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Cappfinity 36
0.8 weighted points to Aon Assessment
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Cappfinity 56
0.6 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Cappfinity 28
0.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Cappfinity 28
0.4 weighted points to Aon Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Cappfinity.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Cappfinity | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 36 | +4 | +0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 56 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 40 (F) | -5 | -4.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Cappfinity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next