§ The result
Aon Assessment and Ceipal tie at 35.
Aon Assessment (Assessment) and Ceipal (ATS-integrated) tie at 35 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Aon Assessment leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Ceipal 4, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Aon Assessment takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Aon Assessment 40, Ceipal 30), which is 53% of the weighted advantage Aon Assessment holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, Aon Assessment 25 to Ceipal 38.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Ceipal
AI-powered applicant tracking and workforce-management platform for staffing firms that sources, matches, and ranks candidates on a 1-to-100 scale against job requirements.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Ceipal under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Ceipal |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Ceipal 30
2.0 weighted points to Aon Assessment
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Ceipal 20
1.8 weighted points to Aon Assessment
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Ceipal 38
1.6 weighted points to Ceipal
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Ceipal 46
1.2 weighted points to Ceipal
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Ceipal 53
0.4 weighted points to Ceipal
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Ceipal 46
0.1 weighted points to Ceipal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Ceipal.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Ceipal | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 20 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 46 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 46 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 53 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 35 (F) | - | +0.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Ceipal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Ceipal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next