§ The result
Codility leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
Codility finishes 19 points clear of Aon Assessment inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 54 against 35. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria, Aon Assessment none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Aon Assessment 30 to Codility 45. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Aon Assessment 25, Codility 50) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Aon Assessment 40, Codility 60), the second being 22% of the weighted advantage Codility holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
§ The record
Aon Assessment and Codility are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Codility |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | DE | GB |
| Founded | 2002 | 2009 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 22% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Codility 60
4.0 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Codility 50
3.0 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Codility 57
2.9 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Codility 45
2.7 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Codility 42
2.5 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Codility 62
2.0 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Codility 66
1.4 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Codility.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Codility | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 57 | -19 | -2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 50 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 66 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 54 (F) | -19 | -18.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Codility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next