HomeCompareAon Assessment vs Dover

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Aon Assessment vs Dover

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Dover leads Aon Assessment by 10 points.

Dover sits 10 points above Aon Assessment under rubric v1.0 — 45 against 35 — with Dover filed under Sourcing and Aon Assessment under Assessment. Dover leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Aon Assessment leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 30, Dover 52, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Dover holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Dover under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAon AssessmentDover
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded20022019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Aon Assessment 30 · Dover 52

    4.0 weighted points to Dover

  2. 12% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Aon Assessment 25 · Dover 44

    2.3 weighted points to Dover

  3. 15% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Aon Assessment 38 · Dover 50

    1.8 weighted points to Dover

  4. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Aon Assessment 45 · Dover 58

    1.6 weighted points to Dover

  5. 20% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Aon Assessment 40 · Dover 34

    1.2 weighted points to Aon Assessment

  6. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Aon Assessment 48 · Dover 60

    1.0 weighted points to Dover

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Aon Assessment 25 · Dover 30

    0.8 weighted points to Dover

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Aon Assessment minus Dover.

CategoryWeightAon AssessmentDoverΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4034+6+1.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%3052-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%3850-12-1.8
Human Oversight Design12%4558-13-1.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%2544-19-2.3
Customer Documentation8%4860-12-1.0
Total100%35 (F)45 (F)-10-10.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAon AssessmentDover
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Audit reportSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1121Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%116Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain134Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Dover has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and Dover sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Dover, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Aon Assessment last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Dover last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.