Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Aon Assessment vs Findem
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Findem
AI talent-intelligence platform that uses 'attribute'/3D-data enrichment over 850M+ candidate profiles to power candidate search, sourcing, talent CRM, and agentic recruiting workflows.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Findem leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Findem (Sourcing) opens a 23-point lead on Aon Assessment (Assessment), 58 to 35. Findem takes all 7 criteria and Aon Assessment none of them; the nearest contest is Customer Documentation, Aon Assessment 48 to Findem 58. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Aon Assessment 30, Findem 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Findem holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Aon Assessment0
- Findem7
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency30 vs 83
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Findem under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Aon Assessment is in scope of
| Record | Aon Assessment | Findem |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight42% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment30Findem839.5 weighted points to Findem
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight58% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment40Findem583.6 weighted points to Findem
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight71% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment38Findem572.9 weighted points to Findem
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight80% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment25Findem422.0 weighted points to Findem
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment25Findem381.9 weighted points to Findem
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment45Findem601.8 weighted points to Findem
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment48Findem580.8 weighted points to Findem
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Findem, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Findem | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 83 | -53 | -9.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 57 | -19 | -2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 35F | 58F | -23 | -22.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Findem | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Findem has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and Findem sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Findem, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Findem last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.