§ The result
Harver leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
Harver finishes 21 points clear of Aon Assessment inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 35. Harver leads every one of the 7 criteria, Aon Assessment none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Aon Assessment 45 to Harver 50. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Aon Assessment 30, Harver 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
§ The record
Aon Assessment and Harver are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Harver |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | NL |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Harver 80
9.0 weighted points to Harver
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Harver 65
5.0 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Harver 55
2.5 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Harver 40
1.8 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Harver 35
1.5 weighted points to Harver
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Harver 60
1.0 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Harver 50
0.6 weighted points to Harver
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -21.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Harver.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Harver | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 65 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 80 | -50 | -9.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 56 (F) | -21 | -21.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Harver | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 27 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next