Harver

Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Assessment

HireAIScore rates Harver 56 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed May 21, 2026. Harver ranks 7 of 82 vendors rated in Assessment AI, against a category average of 46. That score is drawn from 10 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Harver — 10 with a cited source.

Score breakdown

Harver, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20% · avg 50

    65

    +13.0

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18% · avg 41

    80

    +14.4

  3. FRIA Support

    Weight 15% · avg 31

    35

    +5.3

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15% · avg 53

    55

    +8.3

  5. Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12% · avg 55

    50

    +6.0

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12% · avg 38

    40

    +4.8

  7. Customer Documentation

    Weight 8% · avg 58

    60

    +4.8

Total weighted score

56.5(rounded to 56 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 82 Assessment AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Bias Audit Transparency

80raw / 100

Contributes 14.4 to the total. 80 against a 41 category average.

Weakest criterion

FRIA Support

35raw / 100

Contributes 5.3 to the total. 35 against a 31 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items
10
Documentation
7
Audit report
2
Public statement
1
With a source URL
10 of 10
Source hostnames
1
Fewest items
1
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly Harver was reviewed, not how Harver performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

3 items65

Bias Audit Transparency

2 items80

FRIA Support

1 item35

Data Governance Disclosure

1 item55

Human Oversight Design

1 item50

Post-Market Monitoring

1 item40
  • Public statementCaptured May 21, 2026

    Security contact GlobalSecurity@harver.com. No AI-specific monitoring channel public.

    https://harver.com/security/

Customer Documentation

1 item60

Editorial notes

Company overview

Harver is a pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral tendencies, and situational judgement. Following the 2022 acquisition of Pymetrics, Harver also owns the games-based assessment product line. The combined platform is one of the largest assessment vendors used in enterprise hiring.

Regulatory exposure

Pre-employment assessment is the most regulated surface in AI hiring. EU AI Act Annex III §4 treats hiring-decision AI as high-risk. NYC LL 144 applies to assessments used in NYC; Colorado, Illinois, and several other US states will add overlapping regimes through 2026. The Pymetrics product line, in particular, was the subject of early academic and regulator scrutiny on bias-audit methodology - that history raises the bar for what the directory expects to see published.

Path to a higher score

To move into the B band on this rubric, Harver would need to publish (a) a current bias audit per NYC LL 144 covering each assessment product separately, (b) Annex IV-aligned technical packs (or summaries) for the cognitive, behavioral, and games-based assessments, and (c) FRIA-ready deployer documentation that distinguishes intended use across the product lines so a single deployer FRIA does not have to make assumptions.

Regulatory frame

What applies to assessment AI.

Assessment is the most-regulated surface in AI hiring. NYC LL 144, EEOC and OFCCP frameworks, Illinois HB 3773, and EU AI Act Annex III §4 all apply, with overlap on bias-audit obligations.

Keep reading

All assessment vendorsHow this score is builtAnnex IV section-by-section: what AI hiring vendors must documentWhat makes a defensible NYC LL 144 bias audit

Compare

Harver against its nearest-scoring peers.

The closest scores in Assessment AI, side by side.

Build any comparison

Ranking

Others rated in Assessment AI

Ranked 7 of 82 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. #4HireVue58F
  2. #5Fuel5058F
  3. #6Bryq57F
  4. #7HarverThis profile56F
  5. #8Sapia.ai56F
  6. #9Cornerstone OnDemand56F
All assessment vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.