Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Bryq vs Harver
Bryq
Bryq is a science-based talent-intelligence platform whose core product is a short, blind, chatbot-driven pre-hire assessment scoring candidates on cognitive ability, personality/behavioral traits, and job skills to produce a job-fit "match" score used for hiring and internal mobility.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Bryq and Harver.
Under rubric v1.0, Bryq and Harver finish 1 point apart, 57 to 56, as two Assessment entries. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Bryq: Bryq is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and Harver on Article 11 Technical Documentation. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — Harver takes Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20%, Bryq 54 to Harver 65, 55% of the weighted advantage Harver holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Post-Market Monitoring, Bryq 55 to Harver 40.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Bryq5
- Harver2
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring55 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Bryq and Harver are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Bryq | Harver |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight26% of the movement so far
Bryq54Harver652.2 weighted points to Harver
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight47% of the movement so far
Bryq70Harver801.8 weighted points to Harver
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight68% of the movement so far
Bryq55Harver401.8 weighted points to Bryq
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight80% of the movement so far
Bryq62Harver551.1 weighted points to Bryq
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight89% of the movement so far
Bryq40Harver350.8 weighted points to Bryq
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Bryq54Harver500.5 weighted points to Bryq
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Bryq66Harver600.5 weighted points to Bryq
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Bryq minus Harver, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Bryq | Harver | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 54 | 65 | -11 | -2.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 70 | 80 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 50 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 60 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 57F | 56F | +1 | +0.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Bryq | Harver | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Bryq last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against