§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
Interviewer.AI sits 12 points above Aon Assessment under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 35 — with Interviewer.AI filed under Video interview and Aon Assessment under Assessment. Interviewer.AI leads every one of the 7 criteria, Aon Assessment none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Aon Assessment 30 to Interviewer.AI 35. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 38, Interviewer.AI 60, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 29% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Interviewer.AI under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Interviewer.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | SG |
| Founded | 2002 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Interviewer.AI 60
3.3 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
20% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Interviewer.AI 52
2.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Interviewer.AI 60
1.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Interviewer.AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
18% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Interviewer.AI 35
0.9 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Interviewer.AI 32
0.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Interviewer.AI 58
0.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Interviewer.AI.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Interviewer.AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 32 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 47 (F) | -12 | -11.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Interviewer.AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next