HomeCompareAon Assessment vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Aon Assessment vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter finishes 22 points clear of Aon Assessment under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 35 — across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. LinkedIn Recruiter leads every one of the 7 criteria and 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Aon Assessment leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 40, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 25% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAon AssessmentLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded20022002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 25% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Aon Assessment 40 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    5.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Aon Assessment 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    3.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 15% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Aon Assessment 38 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    3.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Aon Assessment 25 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    3.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Aon Assessment 45 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    2.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Aon Assessment 25 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Aon Assessment 48 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    1.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Aon Assessment minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightAon AssessmentLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4067-27-5.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3050-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2538-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%3862-24-3.6
Human Oversight Design12%4566-21-2.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%2550-25-3.0
Customer Documentation8%4868-20-1.6
Total100%35 (F)57 (F)-22-21.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAon AssessmentLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Audit reportSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11—61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%116Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Aon Assessment last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.