§ The result
PageUp leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 29 points between PageUp (ATS-integrated) and Aon Assessment (Assessment): 64 (D) for PageUp, 35 (F) for Aon Assessment. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Aon Assessment leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 30, PageUp 80, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | AU |
| Founded | 2002 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · PageUp 80
9.0 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · PageUp 74
6.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · PageUp 63
3.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · PageUp 55
3.6 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · PageUp 64
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · PageUp 40
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · PageUp 63
1.2 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -28.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -29 beside that -28.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 74 | -34 | -6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 80 | -50 | -9.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 63 | -25 | -3.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 64 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 55 | -30 | -3.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 63 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 64 (D) | -29 | -28.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next