HomeCompareAon Assessment vs RippleMatch

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Aon Assessment vs RippleMatch

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

RippleMatch leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.

RippleMatch, filed under Sourcing, comes out 11 points above Aon Assessment, filed under Assessment: 46 against 35 under rubric v1.0. Of the 7 criteria Aon Assessment wins none, and the narrowest lead RippleMatch holds is on FRIA Support, Aon Assessment 25 to RippleMatch 27. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 30, RippleMatch 53, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage RippleMatch holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, RippleMatch under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAon AssessmentRippleMatch
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded20022016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Aon Assessment 30 · RippleMatch 53

    4.1 weighted points to RippleMatch

  2. 15% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Aon Assessment 38 · RippleMatch 50

    1.8 weighted points to RippleMatch

  3. 12% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Aon Assessment 45 · RippleMatch 57

    1.4 weighted points to RippleMatch

  4. 12% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Aon Assessment 25 · RippleMatch 37

    1.4 weighted points to RippleMatch

  5. 20% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Aon Assessment 40 · RippleMatch 46

    1.2 weighted points to RippleMatch

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Aon Assessment 48 · RippleMatch 60

    1.0 weighted points to RippleMatch

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Aon Assessment 25 · RippleMatch 27

    0.3 weighted points to RippleMatch

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Aon Assessment minus RippleMatch.

CategoryWeightAon AssessmentRippleMatchΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4046-6-1.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%3053-23-4.1
FRIA Support15%2527-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%3850-12-1.8
Human Oversight Design12%4557-12-1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%2537-12-1.4
Customer Documentation8%4860-12-1.0
Total100%35 (F)46 (F)-11-11.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAon AssessmentRippleMatch
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Audit reportSources on a separate domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain71Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11—31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%116Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain357Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; RippleMatch has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and RippleMatch sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 42 for RippleMatch, across 5 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Aon Assessment last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
RippleMatch last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.