HomeCompareAon Assessment vs SmartRecruiters

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Aon Assessment vs SmartRecruiters

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.

Rubric v1.0 puts 27 points between SmartRecruiters (ATS-integrated) and Aon Assessment (Assessment): 62 (D) for SmartRecruiters, 35 (F) for Aon Assessment. SmartRecruiters leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Aon Assessment leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 30, SmartRecruiters 78, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAon AssessmentSmartRecruiters
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded20022010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Aon Assessment 30 · SmartRecruiters 78

    8.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 20% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Aon Assessment 40 · SmartRecruiters 70

    6.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Aon Assessment 38 · SmartRecruiters 62

    3.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 15% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Aon Assessment 25 · SmartRecruiters 45

    3.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Aon Assessment 25 · SmartRecruiters 48

    2.8 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Aon Assessment 45 · SmartRecruiters 62

    2.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Aon Assessment 48 · SmartRecruiters 63

    1.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -27.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -27.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Aon Assessment minus SmartRecruiters.

CategoryWeightAon AssessmentSmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4070-30-6.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3078-48-8.6
FRIA Support15%2545-20-3.0
Data Governance Disclosure15%3862-24-3.6
Human Oversight Design12%4562-17-2.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%2548-23-2.8
Customer Documentation8%4863-15-1.2
Total100%35 (F)62 (D)-27-27.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAon AssessmentSmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Audit reportSources on a separate domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1111Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%116Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Aon Assessment last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.