§ The result
Tribepad leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Tribepad (ATS-integrated) opens a 21-point lead on Aon Assessment (Assessment), 56 to 35. Of the 7 criteria Aon Assessment wins none, and the narrowest lead Tribepad holds is on FRIA Support, Aon Assessment 25 to Tribepad 30. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Aon Assessment 30, Tribepad 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Tribepad |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | GB |
| Founded | 2002 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Tribepad 78
8.6 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Tribepad 54
3.5 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Tribepad 56
3.2 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Tribepad 56
2.7 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Tribepad 58
1.6 weighted points to Tribepad
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Tribepad 58
0.8 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Tribepad 30
0.8 weighted points to Tribepad
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -21.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Tribepad.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Tribepad | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 56 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 78 | -48 | -8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 54 | -29 | -3.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 56 (F) | -21 | -21.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Tribepad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next