Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Aon Assessment vs VidCruiter
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
VidCruiter
VidCruiter is an enterprise recruitment platform combining live and pre-recorded video interviewing, structured interview workflows, automated scheduling, skills testing, automated reference checks, and AI features such as transcript-based AI Interview Scoring, AI Interview Notes, and AI fraud detection.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
VidCruiter leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
VidCruiter, filed under Video interview, comes out 13 points above Aon Assessment, filed under Assessment: 48 against 35 under rubric v1.0. VidCruiter takes all 7 criteria from Aon Assessment without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, Aon Assessment 25 to VidCruiter 32. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 40, VidCruiter 58, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 28% of the weighted advantage VidCruiter holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Aon Assessment0
- VidCruiter7
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation40 vs 58
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, VidCruiter under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Aon Assessment | VidCruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | CA |
| Founded | 2002 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight28% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment40VidCruiter583.6 weighted points to VidCruiter
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight49% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment38VidCruiter562.7 weighted points to VidCruiter
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight65% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment45VidCruiter622.0 weighted points to VidCruiter
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight77% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment30VidCruiter381.4 weighted points to VidCruiter
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight85% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment25VidCruiter321.1 weighted points to VidCruiter
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment25VidCruiter331.0 weighted points to VidCruiter
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment48VidCruiter601.0 weighted points to VidCruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus VidCruiter, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | VidCruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 32 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 33 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 35F | 48F | -13 | -12.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | VidCruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; VidCruiter has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for VidCruiter, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- VidCruiter last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.