§ The result
LinkedIn Recruiter leads Arctic Shores on all 7 criteria.
LinkedIn Recruiter sits 11 points above Arctic Shores under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 46 — with LinkedIn Recruiter filed under Sourcing and Arctic Shores under Assessment. Of the 7 criteria Arctic Shores wins none, and the narrowest lead LinkedIn Recruiter holds is on FRIA Support, Arctic Shores 35 to LinkedIn Recruiter 38. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (Arctic Shores 30, LinkedIn Recruiter 50) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Arctic Shores 50, LinkedIn Recruiter 67), 30% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks - covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility - rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter is LinkedIn's enterprise sourcing and candidate-management platform, whose Hiring Assistant add-on and AI-Assisted Search use AI to turn intake notes into qualifications, source and rank candidates, evaluate applicants against recruiter-set qualifications, and draft or send outreach.
§ The record
Arctic Shores is filed under Assessment AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Arctic Shores is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arctic Shores | LinkedIn Recruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arctic Shores 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67
3.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arctic Shores 35 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
2.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arctic Shores 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
2.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arctic Shores 56 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66
1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arctic Shores 57 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62
0.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arctic Shores 35 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38
0.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arctic Shores 64 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68
0.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus LinkedIn Recruiter.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | LinkedIn Recruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 67 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 50 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 66 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 68 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 57 (F) | -11 | -11.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arctic Shores | LinkedIn Recruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 34 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arctic Shores has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 73 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Arctic Shores, across 1 distinct source domain, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arctic Shores last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next