Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs Moonhub
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus Moonhub.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | Moonhub | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 30 | +20 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 18 | +17 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 40 | +17 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 48 | +8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 22 | +8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 38 | +26 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 30 (F) | +16 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Moonhub
13 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 3
- absence
- 7
- public statement
- 3