§ The result
Arya by Leoforce leads Arena Analytics on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Arya by Leoforce scores 38 and Arena Analytics 32 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Arya by Leoforce leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Arena Analytics is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Arya by Leoforce leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Arena Analytics 28 to Arya by Leoforce 30. Bias Audit Transparency, at 18%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Arya by Leoforce (Arena Analytics 25, Arya by Leoforce 40), 42% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Human Oversight Design, Arena Analytics 38 to Arya by Leoforce 54.
Vendor profile
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
§ The record
Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, Arya by Leoforce under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Arena Analytics is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arena Analytics | Arya by Leoforce |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arena Analytics 25 · Arya by Leoforce 40
2.7 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arena Analytics 38 · Arya by Leoforce 54
1.9 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arena Analytics 42 · Arya by Leoforce 48
0.9 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arena Analytics 38 · Arya by Leoforce 46
0.6 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arena Analytics 28 · Arya by Leoforce 30
0.2 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -6.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus Arya by Leoforce.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | Arya by Leoforce | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 48 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 54 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 46 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 32 (F) | 38 (F) | -6 | -6.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | Arya by Leoforce | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next