§ The result
Beamery leads Arena Analytics on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 29 points between Beamery (Sourcing) and Arena Analytics (Screening): 61 (D) for Beamery, 32 (F) for Arena Analytics. Beamery leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Arena Analytics leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Arena Analytics 25, Beamery 85, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
§ The record
Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, Beamery under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Arena Analytics is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arena Analytics | Beamery |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2015 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arena Analytics 25 · Beamery 85
10.8 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arena Analytics 30 · Beamery 70
8.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arena Analytics 28 · Beamery 60
3.8 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arena Analytics 42 · Beamery 60
2.7 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arena Analytics 38 · Beamery 55
2.0 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arena Analytics 38 · Beamery 60
1.8 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arena Analytics 25 · Beamery 30
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -29.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 29.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -29 beside that -29.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus Beamery.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | Beamery | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 70 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 85 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 60 | -32 | -3.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 32 (F) | 61 (D) | -29 | -29.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | Beamery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics and Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next