Beamery
HireAIScore rates Beamery 61 out of 100 (grade D, Concerning) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed May 21, 2026. Beamery ranks 4 of 86 vendors rated in Candidate sourcing AI, against a category average of 46. That score is drawn from 11 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Beamery — 10 with a cited source, 1 recording that nothing was located.
Score breakdown
Beamery, criterion by criterion
Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20% · category avg 48
70
+14.0
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18% · category avg 40
85
+15.3
FRIA Support
Weight 15% · category avg 31
30
+4.5
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15% · category avg 53
60
+9.0
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12% · category avg 56
55
+6.6
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12% · category avg 40
60
+7.2
Customer Documentation
Weight 8% · category avg 57
60
+4.8
Total weighted score
61.4(rounded to 61 for display)
Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 86 Candidate sourcing AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.
Strongest criterion
Bias Audit Transparency
85raw / 100
Contributes 15.3 to the total. 85 against a 40 category average.
Weakest criterion
FRIA Support
30raw / 100
Contributes 4.5 to the total. 30 against a 31 category average.
Cited evidence
The evidence behind the score
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.
Download diligence recordEvidence ledger
- Items
- 11
- Documentation
- 3
- Audit report
- 3
- Public statement
- 3
- Product feature
- 1
- Absence
- 1
- With a source URL
- 10 of 11
- Source hostnames
- 2
- Fewest items
- 1
- FRIA Support
These figures measure how thoroughly Beamery was reviewed, not how Beamery performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
2 items70
- DocumentationCaptured May 21, 2026
Public AI page with model exclusion list (race, ethnicity, gender, nationality, income, sexual orientation, political/religious beliefs explicitly excluded).
- Public statementCaptured May 21, 2026
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certification (December 2023).
Bias Audit Transparency
3 items85
- Audit reportCaptured May 21, 2026
Warden AI continuous bias monitoring dashboard: 25,996 records sampled, latest audit April 20, 2026; monthly cadence; 36 Clear results across sex, race/ethnicity, intersectional, age, disability under NYC LL 144 framework.
- Audit reportCaptured May 21, 2026
Original Warden AI audit announcement (August 2024).
https://beamery.com/resources/news/beamery-releases-independent-ai-audit-results-from-warden-ai
- Audit reportCaptured May 21, 2026
Earlier 2022 audit by Parity.
https://beamery.com/resources/news/beamery-completes-ai-audit-for-bias
FRIA Support
1 item30
- AbsenceCaptured May 21, 2026
No public material located as of 2026-05-21.
Where we looked: No FRIA template located.
Data Governance Disclosure
2 items60
- DocumentationCaptured May 21, 2026
Public exclusion list (variables not considered).
- Public statementCaptured May 21, 2026
ISO 42001 covers data governance as a certified control.
Human Oversight Design
1 item55
- DocumentationCaptured May 21, 2026
AI augments human decision-making; continuous bias monitoring is automated.
Post-Market Monitoring
1 item60
- Product featureCaptured May 21, 2026
Warden AI dashboard is itself the post-market monitoring surface - continuously refreshed, public.
Customer Documentation
1 item60
- Public statementCaptured May 21, 2026
First HR-tech signatory to the European Commission's AI Pact.
Editorial notes
Company overview
Beamery is a talent CRM that maintains a long-lived pipeline of past applicants and silver-medalists, with AI-driven candidate matching and a skills-inference layer. The skills inference produces a "skills graph" used both for matching and for downstream workforce planning.
Regulatory exposure
Beamery's candidate-matching feature falls under EU AI Act Annex III §4 and NYC LL 144 wherever it influences hiring decisions. The skills inference layer also raises EU GDPR profiling questions independent of the AI Act - candidates whose skills are inferred (rather than self-declared) have additional rights under Article 22 GDPR. Beamery is UK-headquartered, which adds UK GDPR considerations to the same surface.
Path to a higher score
To move into the B band on this rubric, Beamery would need to publish
(a) a current NYC LL 144 bias audit for the matching flow, (b) a model
card for the skills-inference layer including the Article 22 GDPR
analysis, and (c) FRIA-ready deployer documentation distinguishing the
sourcing surface from the workforce-planning surface.
Regulatory frame
What applies to candidate sourcing AI.
Ranking outputs are inside Annex III §4 when they influence hiring decisions. GDPR Article 22 (automated decision-making) and the GDPR rights around profiling apply independently for EU candidates.
Compare
Beamery against its nearest-scoring peers.
The closest scores in Candidate sourcing AI, side by side.
- Side-by-sideBeamery vs Eightfold AI64D
- Side-by-sideBeamery vs SmartRecruiters62D
- Side-by-sideBeamery vs Sense58F
- Side-by-sideBeamery vs Tezi58F
Ranking
Others rated in Candidate sourcing AI
Ranked 4 of 86 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.
- #1Greenhouse67D
- #2Eightfold AI64D
- #3SmartRecruiters62D
- #4BeameryThis profile61D
- #5Sense58F
- #6Tezi58F
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.