§ The result
Greenhouse leads Beamery by 6 points.
Greenhouse scores 67 and Beamery 61 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Greenhouse leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Beamery leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Beamery 30, Greenhouse 42, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Greenhouse is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Beamery | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 30% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Greenhouse 42
1.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Greenhouse 78
1.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Greenhouse 66
1.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Greenhouse 64
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Greenhouse 64
0.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Greenhouse 58
0.2 weighted points to Beamery
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Greenhouse 86
0.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 78 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 86 | -1 | -0.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 67 (D) | -6 | -5.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next