§ The result
Beamery leads Phenom by 9 points.
Beamery scores 61 (D) and Phenom 52 (F) under rubric v1.0 — a 9-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. Beamery leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while Phenom leads 1, including Human Oversight Design, and 1 is level. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Beamery 60, Phenom 30, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Phenom
Talent experience platform combining a career site CMS, candidate CRM, internal mobility, and conversational AI for screening and scheduling.
§ The record
Beamery and Phenom are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Phenom is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Beamery | Phenom |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Phenom 30
3.6 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Phenom 55
3.0 weighted points to Beamery
18% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Phenom 75
1.8 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Phenom 25
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Phenom 60
0.6 weighted points to Phenom
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Phenom 55
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +9.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Phenom.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Phenom | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 55 | +15 | +3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 75 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 30 | +30 | +3.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 52 (F) | +9 | +9.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Phenom | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Phenom has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 21 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 10 for Phenom, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Phenom last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next