Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Beamery vs Eightfold AI
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Concerning
Sourcing
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Concerning
Sourcing
The result
3 points separate Eightfold AI and Beamery.
Within the Sourcing cohort, Eightfold AI edges Beamery by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 64 to 61. Eightfold AI leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Beamery leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 3 are level. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 30, Eightfold AI 45 — and at a 15% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Beamery1
- Eightfold AI3
- Level3
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support30 vs 45
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Beamery and Eightfold AI are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Beamery | Eightfold AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight45% of the movement so far
Beamery30Eightfold AI452.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight68% of the movement so far
Beamery60Eightfold AI501.2 weighted points to Beamery
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight88% of the movement so far
Beamery70Eightfold AI751.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Beamery55Eightfold AI600.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -2.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Eightfold AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Eightfold AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 75 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 85 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61D | 64D | -3 | -2.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Eightfold AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 26 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against