§ The result
Cappfinity leads Arena Analytics on all 7 criteria.
Cappfinity scores 40 and Arena Analytics 32 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Cappfinity is ahead of Arena Analytics on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at Arena Analytics 25 to Cappfinity 28. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (Arena Analytics 38, Cappfinity 56) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Human Oversight Design at 12% (Arena Analytics 38, Cappfinity 52), 21% of the weighted advantage Cappfinity builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
§ The record
Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, Cappfinity under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arena Analytics | Cappfinity |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2015 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 21% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arena Analytics 38 · Cappfinity 52
1.7 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arena Analytics 42 · Cappfinity 52
1.5 weighted points to Cappfinity
8% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arena Analytics 38 · Cappfinity 56
1.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arena Analytics 30 · Cappfinity 36
1.2 weighted points to Cappfinity
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arena Analytics 28 · Cappfinity 38
1.2 weighted points to Cappfinity
18% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arena Analytics 25 · Cappfinity 28
0.5 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arena Analytics 25 · Cappfinity 28
0.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus Cappfinity.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | Cappfinity | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 32 (F) | 40 (F) | -8 | -8.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | Cappfinity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics and Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next