§ The result
HireVue leads Arena Analytics on all 7 criteria.
HireVue (Video interview) and Arena Analytics (Screening) are 26 points apart under rubric v1.0, 58 for HireVue against 32 for Arena Analytics. Arena Analytics leads none of the 7 criteria, and HireVue is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage HireVue holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Arena Analytics 25, HireVue 80, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points HireVue gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
§ The record
Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, HireVue under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arena Analytics | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arena Analytics 25 · HireVue 80
9.9 weighted points to HireVue
20% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arena Analytics 30 · HireVue 65
7.0 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arena Analytics 38 · HireVue 60
2.6 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arena Analytics 28 · HireVue 45
2.0 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arena Analytics 42 · HireVue 55
1.9 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arena Analytics 25 · HireVue 35
1.5 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arena Analytics 38 · HireVue 55
1.4 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -26.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -26.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus HireVue.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | HireVue | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 65 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 80 | -55 | -9.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 45 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 32 (F) | 58 (F) | -26 | -26.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | HireVue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics and HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next