Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arena Analytics vs Qureos
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Substantial gaps
Screening
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
1 point separates Qureos and Arena Analytics.
Under rubric v1.0, Qureos and Arena Analytics finish 1 point apart, 33 to 32, as two Screening entries. Arena Analytics takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 4 for Qureos, whose share includes Human Oversight Design, and 1 is level. Arena Analytics takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Arena Analytics 25, Qureos 12), 85% of the weighted advantage it builds, while the widest raw gap is on Human Oversight Design, Arena Analytics 38 to Qureos 54.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Arena Analytics2
- Qureos4
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design38 vs 54
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Arena Analytics and Qureos are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Arena Analytics | Qureos |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AE |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight34% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics25Qureos122.3 weighted points to Arena Analytics
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight62% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics38Qureos541.9 weighted points to Qureos
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight78% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics38Qureos521.1 weighted points to Qureos
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight90% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics28Qureos350.8 weighted points to Qureos
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight96% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics30Qureos280.4 weighted points to Arena Analytics
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics42Qureos440.3 weighted points to Qureos
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus Qureos, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | Qureos | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 12 | +13 | +2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 44 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 54 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 32F | 33F | -1 | -1.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | Qureos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.