§ The result
BambooHR leads Arya by Leoforce by 5 points.
BambooHR scores 43 and Arya by Leoforce 38 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of BambooHR: BambooHR is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Arya by Leoforce on Bias Audit Transparency. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (Arya by Leoforce 46, BambooHR 62) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Arya by Leoforce 30, BambooHR 42), 30% of the weighted advantage BambooHR builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
BambooHR
A cloud HR platform for small and mid-sized businesses combining an HRIS and applicant tracking with generative AI features such as AI-drafted job descriptions and a natural-language HR data assistant.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, BambooHR under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Arya by Leoforce is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | BambooHR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 23% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · BambooHR 42
2.4 weighted points to BambooHR
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · BambooHR 28
2.2 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
12% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · BambooHR 44
1.7 weighted points to BambooHR
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arya by Leoforce 25 · BambooHR 34
1.3 weighted points to BambooHR
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · BambooHR 62
1.3 weighted points to BambooHR
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · BambooHR 56
1.2 weighted points to BambooHR
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · BambooHR 50
0.5 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus BambooHR.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | BambooHR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 34 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 56 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 50 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 44 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 62 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 43 (F) | -5 | -5.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | BambooHR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; BambooHR has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for BambooHR, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- BambooHR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next