§ The result
HiBob leads Arya by Leoforce by 8 points.
HiBob scores 46 and Arya by Leoforce 38 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Arya by Leoforce takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for HiBob, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Arya by Leoforce 30, HiBob 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage HiBob holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HiBob under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | HiBob |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · HiBob 55
5.0 weighted points to HiBob
18% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · HiBob 20
3.6 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
12% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · HiBob 47
2.0 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arya by Leoforce 25 · HiBob 35
1.5 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · HiBob 57
1.3 weighted points to HiBob
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · HiBob 61
1.2 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · HiBob 63
1.1 weighted points to HiBob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus HiBob.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | HiBob | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 55 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 20 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 57 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 63 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 47 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 61 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 46 (F) | -8 | -8.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | HiBob | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next