§ The result
HeyMilo leads Avature on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo sits 13 points above Avature under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 48 (F) — with HeyMilo filed under Screening and Avature under ATS-integrated. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, Avature none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Article 11 Technical Documentation, Avature 55 to HeyMilo 58. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Avature 40, HeyMilo 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 64% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Avature
Avature is an enterprise talent acquisition and talent management platform (recruiting CRM, ATS, onboarding and internal mobility) with built-in AI for semantic search, explainable weighted candidate matching and ranking, candidate fraud detection and configurable recruiting agents.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Avature is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Avature | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2004 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Avature 40 · HeyMilo 83
7.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Avature 32 · HeyMilo 42
1.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Avature 40 · HeyMilo 46
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Avature 55 · HeyMilo 58
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Avature 58 · HeyMilo 62
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Avature 60 · HeyMilo 64
0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Avature 60 · HeyMilo 66
0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Avature minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Avature | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 83 | -43 | -7.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 42 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 46 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 61 (D) | -13 | -12.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Avature | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Avature has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Avature and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Avature, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Avature last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next