§ The result
Avionté leads Cappfinity by 5 points.
Avionté scores 45 and Cappfinity 40 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Avionté: Avionté is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Cappfinity on Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Avionté 50, Cappfinity 36) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage Avionté holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Avionté
AviontéBOLD is a front- and back-office platform for staffing agencies (ATS/CRM, onboarding, payroll and billing): its AI Matching Agent ranks candidates already in an agency's database for each job, and its Claude-powered PIXEL chatbot pre-screens and scores applicants.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
§ The record
Avionté is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Cappfinity under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Cappfinity is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Avionté | Cappfinity |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2005 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Avionté 50 · Cappfinity 36
2.8 weighted points to Avionté
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Avionté 22 · Cappfinity 28
1.1 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Avionté 35 · Cappfinity 28
1.1 weighted points to Avionté
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Avionté 60 · Cappfinity 52
1.0 weighted points to Avionté
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Avionté 45 · Cappfinity 38
0.8 weighted points to Avionté
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Avionté 62 · Cappfinity 56
0.5 weighted points to Avionté
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Avionté 55 · Cappfinity 52
0.4 weighted points to Avionté
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Avionté minus Cappfinity.
| Category | Weight | Avionté | Cappfinity | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 36 | +14 | +2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 56 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 40 (F) | +5 | +5.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Avionté | Cappfinity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Avionté has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Avionté and Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Avionté, across 4 distinct source domains, and 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Avionté last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next