§ The result
Codility leads Avionté on all 7 criteria.
Codility scores 54 and Avionté 45 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Avionté wins none, and the narrowest lead Codility holds is on Data Governance Disclosure, Avionté 55 to Codility 57. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Avionté 22, Codility 45) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Codility holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Avionté
AviontéBOLD is a front- and back-office platform for staffing agencies (ATS/CRM, onboarding, payroll and billing): its AI Matching Agent ranks candidates already in an agency's database for each job, and its Claude-powered PIXEL chatbot pre-screens and scores applicants.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
§ The record
Avionté is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Codility under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Codility is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Avionté | Codility |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2005 | 2009 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Avionté 22 · Codility 45
4.1 weighted points to Codility
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Avionté 50 · Codility 60
2.0 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Avionté 35 · Codility 42
1.1 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Avionté 45 · Codility 50
0.6 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Avionté 62 · Codility 66
0.3 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Avionté 55 · Codility 57
0.3 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Avionté 60 · Codility 62
0.2 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Avionté minus Codility.
| Category | Weight | Avionté | Codility | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 45 | -23 | -4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 57 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 54 (F) | -9 | -8.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Avionté | Codility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Avionté has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Avionté sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Avionté, across 4 distinct source domains, and 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Avionté last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next