HomeCompareAvionté vs Willo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Avionté vs Willo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate Avionté and Willo.

Avionté (ATS-integrated) edges Willo (Video interview) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 45 to 41. Willo takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for Avionté, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Avionté 50, Willo 38) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage Avionté holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Avionté is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Willo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAviontéWillo
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20052018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Avionté 50 · Willo 38

    2.4 weighted points to Avionté

  2. 15% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Avionté 35 · Willo 25

    1.5 weighted points to Avionté

  3. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Avionté 22 · Willo 30

    1.4 weighted points to Willo

  4. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Avionté 45 · Willo 36

    1.1 weighted points to Avionté

  5. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Avionté 62 · Willo 54

    0.6 weighted points to Avionté

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Avionté 55 · Willo 53

    0.3 weighted points to Avionté

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Avionté 60 · Willo 62

    0.2 weighted points to Willo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Avionté minus Willo.

CategoryWeightAviontéWilloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5038+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2230-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5553+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6062-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4536+9+1.1
Customer Documentation8%6254+8+0.6
Total100%45 (F)41 (F)+4+4.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAviontéWillo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%276Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Avionté has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Avionté sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Avionté, across 4 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Avionté last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Willo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.