§ The result
Beamery leads BambooHR by 18 points.
Beamery finishes 18 points clear of BambooHR under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 43 (F) — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Beamery leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while BambooHR leads 2, including FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — BambooHR 28, Beamery 85 — and at an 18% weight it carries 54% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
BambooHR
A cloud HR platform for small and mid-sized businesses combining an HRIS and applicant tracking with generative AI features such as AI-drafted job descriptions and a natural-language HR data assistant.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
§ The record
BambooHR is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Beamery under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | BambooHR | Beamery |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2008 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
BambooHR 28 · Beamery 85
10.3 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
BambooHR 42 · Beamery 70
5.6 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
BambooHR 44 · Beamery 60
1.9 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
BambooHR 34 · Beamery 30
0.6 weighted points to BambooHR
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
BambooHR 56 · Beamery 60
0.6 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
BambooHR 50 · Beamery 55
0.6 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
BambooHR 62 · Beamery 60
0.2 weighted points to BambooHR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -18.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is BambooHR minus Beamery.
| Category | Weight | BambooHR | Beamery | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 70 | -28 | -5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 85 | -57 | -10.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 34 | 30 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 60 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 43 (F) | 61 (D) | -18 | -18.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | BambooHR | Beamery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
BambooHR has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for BambooHR, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- BambooHR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next