HomeCompareBambooHR vs Jobma

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

BambooHR vs Jobma

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Jobma leads BambooHR on 4 of the 7 criteria.

Jobma scores 49 and BambooHR 43 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Video interview and ATS-integrated cohorts. Jobma leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so BambooHR is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 Jobma leads is FRIA Support, BambooHR 34 to Jobma 35. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — BambooHR 42, Jobma 55 — and at a 20% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Jobma holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

BambooHR is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Jobma under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Jobma is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBambooHRJobma
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20082012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    BambooHR 42 · Jobma 55

    2.6 weighted points to Jobma

  2. 18% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    BambooHR 28 · Jobma 40

    2.2 weighted points to Jobma

  3. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    BambooHR 50 · Jobma 60

    1.2 weighted points to Jobma

  4. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    BambooHR 34 · Jobma 35

    0.1 weighted points to Jobma

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -6.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is BambooHR minus Jobma.

CategoryWeightBambooHRJobmaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4255-13-2.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2840-12-2.2
FRIA Support15%3435-1-0.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5656--
Human Oversight Design12%5060-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4444--
Customer Documentation8%6262--
Total100%43 (F)49 (F)-6-6.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBambooHRJobma
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Sources on the vendor's own domain174Sources on the vendor's own domain

BambooHR has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for BambooHR, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
BambooHR last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobma last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.