§ The result
Beamery leads Cezanne Recruitment by 20 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Beamery (Sourcing) opens a 20-point lead on Cezanne Recruitment (ATS-integrated), 61 (D) to 41 (F). The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Beamery: Beamery is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Cezanne Recruitment on Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, Cezanne Recruitment 24 — and at an 18% weight it carries 54% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Cezanne Recruitment under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Cezanne Recruitment is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Beamery | Cezanne Recruitment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | GB |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Cezanne Recruitment 24
11.0 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Cezanne Recruitment 40
6.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Cezanne Recruitment 44
1.9 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Cezanne Recruitment 54
0.9 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Cezanne Recruitment 58
0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Cezanne Recruitment 28
0.3 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Cezanne Recruitment 57
0.2 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +20.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Cezanne Recruitment.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Cezanne Recruitment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 40 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 24 | +61 | +11.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 54 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 44 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 57 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 41 (F) | +20 | +20.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Cezanne Recruitment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next