HomeCompareBeamery vs ClearCo (ClearCompany)

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Beamery vs ClearCo (ClearCompany)

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Beamery leads ClearCo (ClearCompany) by 15 points.

Beamery finishes 15 points clear of ClearCo (ClearCompany) under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 46 (F) — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 4 to 1 in favour of Beamery, with 2 level: Beamery is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and ClearCo (ClearCompany) on Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Beamery 85, ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 63% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, ClearCo (ClearCompany) under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only ClearCo (ClearCompany) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBeameryClearCo (ClearCompany)
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20132004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Beamery 85 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28

    10.3 weighted points to Beamery

  2. 20% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Beamery 70 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56

    2.8 weighted points to Beamery

  3. 12% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Beamery 60 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37

    2.8 weighted points to Beamery

  4. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Beamery 55 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 63

    1.0 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Beamery 60 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 57

    0.4 weighted points to Beamery

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +15.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +15.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Beamery minus ClearCo (ClearCompany).

CategoryWeightBeameryClearCo (ClearCompany)Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7056+14+2.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%8528+57+10.3
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%6057+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5563-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%6037+23+2.8
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%61 (D)46 (F)+15+15.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBeameryClearCo (ClearCompany)
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%10—42Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%10—41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%101Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain317Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; ClearCo (ClearCompany) has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and ClearCo (ClearCompany) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 38 for ClearCo (ClearCompany), across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Beamery last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
ClearCo (ClearCompany) last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.