§ The result
Beamery leads Darwinbox on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Beamery finishes 15 points clear of Darwinbox under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 46 (F) — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Beamery leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Darwinbox is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Beamery leads is Data Governance Disclosure, Beamery 60 to Darwinbox 58. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Beamery 85, Darwinbox 28) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 65% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Darwinbox
Darwinbox is an enterprise HCM suite whose recruitment module uses Darwinbox Sense AI (now sold inside its Cortex agent platform) to parse resumes, stack-rank and recommend candidates with stated fit reasoning, run screening and shortlisting agents, and give candidates an assistant for job matching, interview details and FAQs.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Darwinbox under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Darwinbox is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Beamery | Darwinbox |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | IN |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Darwinbox 28
10.3 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Darwinbox 35
3.0 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Darwinbox 60
2.0 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Darwinbox 58
0.3 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Darwinbox 57
0.2 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +15.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +15.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Darwinbox.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Darwinbox | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 60 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 28 | +57 | +10.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 57 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 46 (F) | +15 | +15.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Darwinbox | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Darwinbox has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Darwinbox, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Darwinbox last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next