Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Beamery vs Dayforce
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Concerning
Sourcing
Dayforce
Dayforce is an enterprise human capital management platform whose Dayforce Recruiting module uses AI to assign letter grades to external job applicants, generate job descriptions, and automate screening and hiring workflows alongside HR, payroll, time, talent, and analytics.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Beamery takes the total, Dayforce takes more of the criteria.
Beamery holds a 4-point edge over Dayforce under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) to 57 (F), across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Dayforce leads more of the criteria, 5 against 2 for Beamery, yet Beamery takes Bias Audit Transparency, which carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, Dayforce 42 — and at an 18% weight it carries 83% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Beamery2
- Dayforce5
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency85 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Dayforce under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Dayforce is in scope of
| Record | Beamery | Dayforce |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 1992 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight54% of the movement so far
Beamery85Dayforce427.7 weighted points to Beamery
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight65% of the movement so far
Beamery55Dayforce681.6 weighted points to Dayforce
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight75% of the movement so far
Beamery60Dayforce471.6 weighted points to Beamery
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight86% of the movement so far
Beamery30Dayforce401.5 weighted points to Dayforce
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight91% of the movement so far
Beamery70Dayforce740.8 weighted points to Dayforce
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Beamery60Dayforce700.8 weighted points to Dayforce
- 7
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Beamery60Dayforce630.4 weighted points to Dayforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Dayforce, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Dayforce | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 74 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 42 | +43 | +7.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 68 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 47 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 70 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 61D | 57F | +4 | +4.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Dayforce | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Dayforce has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Dayforce, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Dayforce last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.