§ The result
Beamery leads Dover by 16 points.
Beamery finishes 16 points clear of Dover inside the Sourcing cohort under rubric v1.0: 61 (D) against 45 (F). Beamery leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Dover leads 1, including Human Oversight Design, and 2 are level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 70, Dover 34 — and at a 20% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Dover
Dover is an AI recruiting platform for startups offering a free applicant tracking system, candidate sourcing via a LinkedIn/Copilot browser extension, OpenAI/Anthropic-powered 0-100 applicant scoring, and a fractional-recruiter marketplace.
§ The record
Beamery and Dover are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144.
| Record | Beamery | Dover |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Dover 34
7.2 weighted points to Beamery
18% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Dover 52
5.9 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Dover 44
1.9 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Dover 50
1.5 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Dover 58
0.4 weighted points to Dover
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +16.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +16.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Dover.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Dover | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 34 | +36 | +7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 52 | +33 | +5.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 44 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 45 (F) | +16 | +16.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Dover | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Dover has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Dover sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Dover, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Dover last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next