§ The result
Beamery leads Emi on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 28 points between Beamery (Sourcing) and Emi (Screening): 61 (D) for Beamery, 33 (F) for Emi. Beamery leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Emi leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Beamery 85, Emi 18) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Emi
Emi runs AI agents on WhatsApp, SMS and Messenger that screen and score frontline job applicants against employer-set criteria, schedule interviews, and collect hiring documents and check them against Mexican government databases.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Emi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Emi is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Beamery | Emi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | AR |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Emi 18
12.1 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Emi 28
8.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Emi 35
3.0 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Emi 44
2.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Emi 44
1.3 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Emi 48
1.0 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Emi 25
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +28.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +28 beside that +28.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Emi.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Emi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 28 | +42 | +8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 18 | +67 | +12.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 44 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 44 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 33 (F) | +28 | +28.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Emi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Emi has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Emi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 26 for Emi, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Emi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next