§ The result
Beamery leads Recruiterflow by 25 points.
Beamery (Sourcing) and Recruiterflow (ATS-integrated) are 25 points apart under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) for Beamery against 36 (F) for Recruiterflow. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Beamery, with 1 level: Beamery is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Recruiterflow on Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, Recruiterflow 18 — and at an 18% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Recruiterflow
Recruiterflow is an ATS and CRM for recruiting agencies and executive search firms. Its AIRA AI layer ranks candidates already in a firm's database against each job with an explainable 0–100 Criteria Score (AIRA Matchmaker, shown as the 'AI Matches' card), and adds natural-language candidate search, external profile sourcing and an AI call notetaker that fills in interview scorecards.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruiterflow under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144.
| Record | Beamery | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Recruiterflow 18
12.1 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Recruiterflow 33
7.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Recruiterflow 33
3.2 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Recruiterflow 44
2.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Recruiterflow 58
0.4 weighted points to Recruiterflow
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Recruiterflow 56
0.3 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +25.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +25.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Recruiterflow.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Recruiterflow | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 33 | +37 | +7.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 18 | +67 | +12.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 44 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 33 | +27 | +3.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 56 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 36 (F) | +25 | +25.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Recruiterflow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Recruiterflow has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Recruiterflow, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruiterflow last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next