HomeCompareBrainner vs Eightfold AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brainner vs Eightfold AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Eightfold AI leads Brainner on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Eightfold AI (Sourcing) opens an 18-point lead on Brainner (Screening), 64 (D) to 46 (F). Eightfold AI takes all 7 criteria and Brainner none of them; the nearest contest is Customer Documentation, Brainner 58 to Eightfold AI 60. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Brainner 42, Eightfold AI 85 — and at an 18% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brainner is filed under Screening AI, Eightfold AI under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Brainner is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBrainnerEightfold AI
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20232016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brainner 42 · Eightfold AI 85

    7.7 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  2. 20% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brainner 52 · Eightfold AI 75

    4.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  3. 15% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brainner 30 · Eightfold AI 45

    2.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  4. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brainner 50 · Eightfold AI 60

    1.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brainner 53 · Eightfold AI 60

    1.1 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brainner 45 · Eightfold AI 50

    0.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Brainner 58 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brainner minus Eightfold AI.

CategoryWeightBrainnerEightfold AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5275-23-4.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4285-43-7.7
FRIA Support15%3045-15-2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5360-7-1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5060-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4550-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%46 (F)64 (D)-18-17.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrainnerEightfold AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10—
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10—
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%334Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Brainner has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Brainner and Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Brainner, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Brainner last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Eightfold AI last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.