HomeCompareBrazen vs Harver

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs Harver

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Harver leads Brazen on all 7 criteria.

Harver finishes 18 points clear of Brazen under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 38 — across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Harver leads every one of the 7 criteria, Brazen none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Brazen 38 to Harver 40. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Brazen 30, Harver 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, Harver under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenHarver
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20072015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · Harver 80

    9.0 weighted points to Harver

  2. 20% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brazen 40 · Harver 65

    5.0 weighted points to Harver

  3. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brazen 25 · Harver 35

    1.5 weighted points to Harver

  4. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brazen 45 · Harver 55

    1.5 weighted points to Harver

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · Harver 50

    0.5 weighted points to Harver

  6. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Brazen 55 · Harver 60

    0.4 weighted points to Harver

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brazen 38 · Harver 40

    0.2 weighted points to Harver

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -18.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus Harver.

CategoryWeightBrazenHarverΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4065-25-5.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3080-50-9.0
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4555-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%4650-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5560-5-0.4
Total100%38 (F)56 (F)-18-18.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenHarver
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1120Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%0110Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain10
Customer Documentation8%0110Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain100Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 23 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Harver last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.