HomeCompareBrazen vs HireLogic

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs HireLogic

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate Brazen and HireLogic.

Brazen holds a 4-point edge over HireLogic under rubric v1.0, 38 to 34, across the Screening and Video interview cohorts. HireLogic takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 3 for Brazen, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Brazen 30, HireLogic 15 — and at an 18% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage Brazen holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenHireLogic
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded2007Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · HireLogic 15

    2.7 weighted points to Brazen

  2. 12% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brazen 38 · HireLogic 28

    1.2 weighted points to Brazen

  3. 8% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Brazen 55 · HireLogic 45

    0.8 weighted points to Brazen

  4. 20% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brazen 40 · HireLogic 42

    0.4 weighted points to HireLogic

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · HireLogic 48

    0.2 weighted points to HireLogic

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +4.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus HireLogic.

CategoryWeightBrazenHireLogicΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4042-2-0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3015+15+2.7
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4545--
Human Oversight Design12%4648-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3828+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%5545+10+0.8
Total100%38 (F)34 (F)+4+4.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenHireLogic
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31—
FRIA Support15%01—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%01—41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain236Sources on the vendor's own domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireLogic last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.