HomeCompareBrazen vs iCIMS

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs iCIMS

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

iCIMS leads Brazen on all 7 criteria.

iCIMS finishes 17 points clear of Brazen under rubric v1.0 — 55 against 38 — across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. iCIMS leads every one of the 7 criteria, Brazen none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Brazen 38 to iCIMS 42. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Brazen 30, iCIMS 68 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage iCIMS holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, iCIMS under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Brazen is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazeniCIMS
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20072000

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 41% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · iCIMS 68

    6.8 weighted points to iCIMS

  2. 20% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brazen 40 · iCIMS 58

    3.6 weighted points to iCIMS

  3. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brazen 25 · iCIMS 38

    1.9 weighted points to iCIMS

  4. 15% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brazen 45 · iCIMS 56

    1.6 weighted points to iCIMS

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · iCIMS 58

    1.4 weighted points to iCIMS

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Brazen 55 · iCIMS 62

    0.6 weighted points to iCIMS

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brazen 38 · iCIMS 42

    0.5 weighted points to iCIMS

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus iCIMS.

CategoryWeightBrazeniCIMSΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4058-18-3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3068-38-6.8
FRIA Support15%2538-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%4556-11-1.6
Human Oversight Design12%4658-12-1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3842-4-0.5
Customer Documentation8%5562-7-0.6
Total100%38 (F)55 (F)-17-16.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazeniCIMS
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1131Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%0140Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain213Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; iCIMS has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 3 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 24 for iCIMS, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
iCIMS last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.