§ The result
Brazen leads Intervue.io by 7 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Brazen, filed under Screening, finishes on 38 and Intervue.io, filed under Video interview, on 31, 7 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Brazen: Brazen is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Intervue.io on Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Brazen 30, Intervue.io 12, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Brazen holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Brazen
Brazen is a recruiting events platform (acquired by Radancy in 2023) that runs virtual and in-person hiring events with a recruiting chatbot, configurable knockout pre-screening, resume filtering, built-in candidate rankings/recommendations, and 1:1 text, audio, and video chats.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Brazen is filed under Screening AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Brazen | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2007 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Brazen 30 · Intervue.io 12
3.2 weighted points to Brazen
20% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Brazen 40 · Intervue.io 28
2.4 weighted points to Brazen
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Brazen 45 · Intervue.io 38
1.1 weighted points to Brazen
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Brazen 46 · Intervue.io 54
1.0 weighted points to Intervue.io
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Brazen 38 · Intervue.io 30
1.0 weighted points to Brazen
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Brazen 25 · Intervue.io 22
0.4 weighted points to Brazen
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Brazen 55 · Intervue.io 50
0.4 weighted points to Brazen
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Brazen minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Brazen | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 12 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 46 | 54 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 31 (F) | +7 | +7.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Brazen | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 0 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Brazen last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next