HomeCompareBryq vs Gem

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bryq vs Gem

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

2 points separate Bryq and Gem.

Bryq (Assessment) edges Gem (Sourcing) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 57 to 55. Bryq leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while Gem leads 2, including Human Oversight Design. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Bryq 55, Gem 47, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 27% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Gem under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Bryq is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBryqGem
Price tierMidHigh
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20172017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 19% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bryq 55 · Gem 47

    1.0 weighted points to Bryq

  2. 12% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bryq 54 · Gem 61

    0.8 weighted points to Gem

  3. 20% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bryq 54 · Gem 58

    0.8 weighted points to Gem

  4. 15% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bryq 40 · Gem 35

    0.8 weighted points to Bryq

  5. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bryq 62 · Gem 57

    0.8 weighted points to Bryq

  6. 18% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bryq 70 · Gem 66

    0.7 weighted points to Bryq

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bryq 66 · Gem 62

    0.3 weighted points to Bryq

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +1.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bryq minus Gem.

CategoryWeightBryqGemΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5458-4-0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%7066+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%4035+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6257+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5461-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%5547+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%6662+4+0.3
Total100%57 (F)55 (F)+2+1.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBryqGem
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%204Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain192Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Gem has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq and Gem sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 21 for Gem, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bryq last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Gem last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.