§ The result
Bryq leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 27 points between Bryq (Assessment) and Moonhub (Sourcing): 57 for Bryq, 30 for Moonhub. Bryq leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Moonhub leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Bryq 70, Moonhub 18, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Bryq
Bryq is a science-based talent-intelligence platform whose core product is a short, blind, chatbot-driven pre-hire assessment scoring candidates on cognitive ability, personality/behavioral traits, and job skills to produce a job-fit "match" score used for hiring and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
§ The record
Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Moonhub under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Bryq is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Bryq | Moonhub |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Bryq 70 · Moonhub 18
9.4 weighted points to Bryq
20% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Bryq 54 · Moonhub 30
4.8 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Bryq 55 · Moonhub 22
4.0 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Bryq 62 · Moonhub 40
3.3 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Bryq 40 · Moonhub 25
2.3 weighted points to Bryq
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Bryq 66 · Moonhub 38
2.2 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Bryq 54 · Moonhub 48
0.7 weighted points to Bryq
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +26.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +27 beside that +26.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Bryq minus Moonhub.
| Category | Weight | Bryq | Moonhub | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 54 | 30 | +24 | +4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 70 | 18 | +52 | +9.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 25 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 40 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 48 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 22 | +33 | +4.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 38 | +28 | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 30 (F) | +27 | +26.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Bryq | Moonhub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Bryq last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next