§ The result
1 point separates Bryq and Workday Recruiting AI.
Bryq (Assessment) edges Workday Recruiting AI (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 57 to 56. Bryq leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while Workday Recruiting AI leads 2, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — Workday Recruiting AI takes Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20%, Bryq 54 to Workday Recruiting AI 70, 71% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Post-Market Monitoring, Bryq 55 to Workday Recruiting AI 35.
Vendor profile
Bryq
Bryq is a science-based talent-intelligence platform whose core product is a short, blind, chatbot-driven pre-hire assessment scoring candidates on cognitive ability, personality/behavioral traits, and job skills to produce a job-fit "match" score used for hiring and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Bryq is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Bryq | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Bryq 54 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
3.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Bryq 55 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
2.4 weighted points to Bryq
18% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Bryq 70 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
1.8 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Bryq 54 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Bryq 62 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
1.1 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Bryq 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Bryq
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Bryq 66 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.1 weighted points to Bryq
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Bryq minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Bryq | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 54 | 70 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 70 | 60 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 65 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 35 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 65 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 56 (F) | +1 | +1.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Bryq | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Bryq last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next